Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 26, 2023
Accepted
Jun 6, 2023
Published
Mar 13, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 123 Download : 101

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Decision Support System is a specialized information system designed to aid management in making effective and efficient decisions on semi-structured problems; it does not replace conventional decision-making procedures. The system that is currently running at the Cicalengka Integrated Ma'arif Vocational School has deficiencies: The process of determining teacher salary increases at the Cicalengka Integrated Ma'arif Vocational School takes more time due to the difficulty of finding data; It's easy to make mistakes because the salary increase process is done manually; It's easy to lose the raise process file. The decision-making function increase in teacher salaries at SMK Ma'arif Terpadu Cicalengka. This thesis uses a Decision Support System with the SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) method then the system development method uses OOAD (object-oriented analysis and design) with the RUP (Rational Unified Process) model. Rational Unified Process (RUP) is a software engineering technique created by compiling the software development industry's best practices. RUP is object-oriented, with activities centered on model development utilizing the Unified Modeling Language (UML). The final result of the Thesis and the making of applications and Decision Support Systems Assessing Performance for Salary Increases/Teachers at SMK Ma'arif Terpadu Cicalengka is a website-based application that can facilitate the process of evaluating performance for salary increases at SMK Ma' Arif Integrated Cicalengka, The Decision Support System built using the SAW method is expected to make it easier for schools to evaluate performance for teacher/manager salary increases; The Decision Support System that is built can minimize errors that occur from the performance appraisal process for teacher/manager salary increases; Can reduce the loss of archives at Integrated Cicalengka Ma'arif Vocational High School.

Keywords

Decision Support System Simple Addictive Use Case Diagrams Activity Diagrams Class Diagram

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Tryana, A., & Agustianie, A. (2023). Decision Support System for Performance Assessment in Raising Teacher Salaries Using the SAW Method at MA’ARIF Vocational School. Edutran Computer Science and Information Technology, 1(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.59805/ecsit.v1i1.39

References

  1. [1] Saverinus Ndoru, Kristianus Jago Tute, and Melky Radja, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Absensi Menggunakan Webcam Dan Deteksi Lokasi Berbasis Web,” Simtek J. Sist. Inf. dan Tek. Komput., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 200–205, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.51876/simtek.v8i1.228.
  2. [2] M. Naiseh, D. Al-Thani, N. Jiang, and R. Ali, “How the different explanation classes impact trust calibration: The case of clinical decision support systems,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 169, p. 102941, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102941.
  3. [3] B. Osmanodja, D. Samhammer, R. Roller, and S. Beck, “Influence of AI-based decision support on shared decision making in hemodialysis: a Wizard of Oz experiment,” วารสารวิชาการมหาวิทยาลัยอีสเทิร์นเอเชีย, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 88–100, 2023.
  4. [4] B. Priyatna, A. Hananto, A. Solehudin, and A. L. Hananto, “Determining the Formulation of Mosquito Repellent Production Raw Materials Using Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ),” vol. 11, pp. 482–489, 2023.
  5. [5] J. Movsessian, “The Need for Teacher Recognition and its Impact on School Culture,” 2018.
  6. [6] D. Toresa, Ahmad Zamsuri, Yogi Yunefri, and Nurfika Sari, “Penerapan Metode Saw Dalam Pemilihan Pegawai Berprestasi Berdasarkan Evaluasi Kinerja Berbasis Kepada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” SATIN - Sains dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 92–105, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33372/stn.v8i1.770.
  7. [7] E. Nurninawati, R. Supriati, and A. Maulana, “Web-Based E-Learning Application to Support the Teaching and Learning Process at Genta Syaputra Senior High School,” Int. J. Cyber IT Serv. Manag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–21, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.34306/ijcitsm.v3i1.96.
  8. [8] E. H. Saputri, S. S. Hilabi, and A. Hananto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphone Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” CAHAYAtech, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 88, 2019, doi: 10.47047/ct.v7i2.13.
  9. [9] S. Shafiee, Y. Wautelet, S. Poelmans, and S. Heng, “An empirical evaluation of scrum training’s suitability for the model-driven development of knowledge-intensive software systems,” Data Knowl. Eng., p. 102195, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2023.102195.
  10. [10] S. Sutedi and M. Agarina, “Implementasi Rational Unified Process dalam Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Penjualan Hasil Bumi Berbasis Web pada CV. Aneka Mandiri Lestari Bandar Lampung,” Explor. J. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat., vol. 8, no. 2, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.36448/jsit.v8i2.958.
  11. [11] G. P. Hartawan, “Implementasi Rational Unified Process Dalam Sistem Informasi E-Sekolah (Studi Kasus SMA Negeri 1 Cibadak)Implementasi Rational Unified Process Dalam Sistem Informasi E-Sekolah (Studi Kasus SMA Negeri 1 Cibadak),” Jurnal SANTIKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Sains dan Teknologi, vol. 7, no. 1. pp. 563–571, 2017.
  12. [12] N. Vafaei, R. A. Ribeiro, and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, “Assessing Normalization Techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 199, pp. 1229–1236, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.156.
  13. [13] N. Marpaung, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Kenaikan Gaji Karyawan,” JURTEKSI, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 171–178, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v4i2.58.
  14. [14] L. Bei et al., “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Aparat Desa Kebirangga Selatan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw),” pp. 93–104.
  15. [15] T. Setiawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Analisis Pencocokan Profil untuk Pemilihan Jurusan di Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 9–18, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.32627/aims.v4i2.144.
  16. [16] R. D. Affandi, H. Pratiwi, Azahari, and M. Ibnu Sa’ad, “Application of the SMARTER Method in Determining the Whitening of Study Permits and Teacher Study Tasks,” Aptisi Trans. Technopreneursh., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 315–325, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.34306/att.v5i2.311.
  17. [17] D. Yang, C. Snelson, and S. Feng, “Identifying computational thinking in students through project-based problem-solving activities,” Inf. Discov. Deliv., Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IDD-09-2022-0091.
  18. [18] P. Tschakert, N. R. Ellis, C. Anderson, A. Kelly, and J. Obeng, “One thousand ways to experience loss: A systematic analysis of climate-related intangible harm from around the world,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 55, pp. 58–72, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.006.
  19. [19] T. Dingsøyr, F. O. Bjørnson, J. Schrof, and T. Sporsem, “A longitudinal explanatory case study of coordination in a very large development programme: the impact of transitioning from a first- to a second-generation large-scale agile development method,” Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 28, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10664-022-10230-6.
  20. [20] A. Merghadi et al., “Machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility studies: A comparative overview of algorithm performance,” Earth-Science Rev., vol. 207, p. 103225, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103225.